The idea that you can only win an election with your own story is bullshit. There is nothing wrong with a good attack on an opponent. In fact, it is a very good way to show who you are. The VVD won the previous election with a clear contrast: do you want to belong to the pessimists (Wilders) or to the optimists (the VVD)? That says something not only about your enemy, but also about you. And it gives people something to want to belong to.
An enemy doesn’t necessarily have to be a person. It can also be something else: immigration, the elite, whatsapp number list Europe. Every party has such an enemy. Wilders and Baudet against the elite. Rutte against the screamers. GroenLinks, PvdA, SP and a whole bunch of other parties against Rutte. D66 against Baudet and vice versa. You have to have something to rebel against.
Also because it scores so well online
Lilian Marijnissen will not mind that ING decided to give the CEO a few million more during the campaign. She could not wish for a ukraine business directory ukraine business directory better enemy than greedy bankers online. She is not going to change anything, but shouting shame about someone else generates a lot of likes. Who or what is
Is what they say true?
You are confronted with all sorts of shocking statements from political parties that rely on figures or statements from someone it worth investing business revenue in the area of digital marketing else. But is it correct? With the success of Donald Trump and Brexit in mind, the urge to have your facts in order will not have increased.
During the previous election, Wilders tweeted a now infamous edited photo of Alexander Pechtold among radical Muslims. Result: everyone angry. But also a photo that was seen by many people and was definitely not registered as fake by everyone.
Unfortunately, it is often the case that spreading untruths or half-truths can be very effective. So pay close attention to whether what is being said is true.
Are they selling hope or fear?