The review can be a very common textual modality in university life or in the reality of an editor. If you know how to
make a review, you probably also know that there are challenges to be faced in search of a 10-grade content.
Knowing this, we have developed a complete step-by-step guide on the best writing practices so that you will have no
difficulties and produce a perfect review. Shall we go?
- 8 steps to make a quality review
8 steps to make a quality review
1. Be very clear about the definition of a review
This concept may seem silly at first glance, but oman telegram data it is important and worth discussing whenever
possible. Do you really know what a review is?
It’s simple: a review can be defined as a type of text intended to analyze an object and write about it.
This object can be an article published online or in academic journals, books, reports and films, among others.
The objective is to work with the construction of descriptions, analysis, observations and development of content that,
in the end, will result in the production of opinion, although this is not made explicit.
Reviews are interesting because, based on the author’s reality, background in the area, opinions and point of view when coming into contact with that material, they will result in original and interesting content.
Try it: if you read 10 reviews of the same book, you can be sure that, even if they don’t express any opinion explicitly, they will have their own particularities and will differ from each other. It’s worth the exercise!
Reviews can exist in two different forms: as descriptive reviews and as critical reviews. It is important to know how to clearly differentiate one from the other in order to avoid making mistakes when producing the text.
The critical review, as the name suggests, presents an explicit point of view of the author about the object.
The editor is free to propose discussions about a specific clipping of the material, unlike a descriptive review, where the goal is to strictly analyze what the author meant to say, without much room for external analysis and relationships.
Knowing the difference between the main types of reviews will make it much easier to continue producing your content.
Subscribe to the newsletter Leave your email!
2. Learn to cut out what really matters
I am not saying that there are “unimportant” elements 6 reasons to use a cross-platform development approach in a book or article, for example. All the material is rich and, if it had not been worthwhile, it would not have been published.
When creating a review, however, you cannot reproduce all of the original material. That would make the production as large as the original, to the point of not justifying the need for a review!
One of the characteristics of reviews is the size they should have.
Even though there are no strictly rigid rules regarding this, it is interesting to produce content that is not too large, since otherwise we would lose objectivity (which is very important in the production of a review).
Knowing that it will be necessary to extract the main opinions from a large material (most of the time) and “summarize” it, it is important to have the discernment to see what deserves to be reviewed and what can only be mentioned in a more distant way.
Be careful with examples. The author may work with many case studies throughout the production, however, it is not your responsibility to transcribe each one in the review.
Explain in detail what examples were used and what they refer to. This way, you can standardize the idea within a larger theme.
3. Present the work analyzed
Don’t confuse the reader. Make it clear in the anhui mobile phone number list first few lines of the text which work is being highlighted. It is also important to present the author’s name, the year of publication, and other bibliographical information.
It is also important to highlight the structure of the object. If it is a book, is it divided into chapters? What is the narrative mode of the text? If appropriate or necessary, it is also interesting to subtly state the number of pages.
4. Make an initial overview
After presenting the technical data, write the first paragraph as a form of introduction .
With this, you will be contextualizing the audience and preparing them for what will be discussed in the text.
5. Make the description of the content
Now, time to review! Tell, in your own words, what was said in the text. Be careful with the size, we are not working with a synopsis or a rereading of the work. Find the middle ground by working with that cut we have already mentioned before.
At this time, it is not the time to present your own opinions or interfere with the ideas proposed by the author.
If the review is critical, the time to systematically analyze the content will be after the descriptive part. When doing this analysis, be careful: opinions must have a basis.
Look for authors who think like you, justify your ideas with concrete examples and be careful not to make this part “too personal” because this can take away all your credibility as an author.