Thus, if the ICJ finds Israel guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity, even without confirming the genocidal qualifiers of these crimes, this decision will be irrevocable. Its transformation, on the other hand, into a mechanism of sanctions, into a demand for an immiate ceasefire, into the implementation of certain measures in relation to the blockade, will have to be approv by a Security Council.
This could be compromis by the risk of an American veto. But even with such a blockage, it would still be historic, because the Israelis would come out of it as legal, moral and therefore political losers.
Already open an investigation in 2021
The International Criminal Court has a different framework. It investigates crimes, but generally prosecutes individuals, not states, unlike the International Court of Justice.
Furthermore, it cannot work in countries that are not signatories to the Treaty of Rome, which found it. To do so, it nes a Security Council resolution allowing it to investigate. This is the case for Israel, which is slovenia phone number library not a signatory. Thus, Israel refuses this Court access to its territory.
Read a
That said, Karim Khan, the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, can still investigate in Gaza, the West Bank or East Jerusalem, because Palestine join the ICC by ratifying the Rome Treaty.
The problem is that he may be afraid of the consequences if he only investigates in Palestinian territory, and in particular that he may be accus of lacking impartiality. So, inde, we are at a standstill. There is hesitation, and perhaps a lack of courage, in this work.
South Africa’s application to the ICJ was support
It is inde countries in the South that are leading this legal battle.
These countries do this in the name of how did you get to youtube? what makes this platform so special? international law, human rights, the Geneva Conventions and in the name of preventing genocide. In the afb directory name of rejecting anything that could harm what humanity had establish as institutions and mechanisms of rights after the Second World War.
From then on, it is no longer a question of the West, which for a very long time claim to be the one carrying out these projects. However, it has very often done so with double standards, by deciding on the geography where international law applies. And by marginalizing or dismissing this same law, in the case of territories or demographies that do not concern it, or that it does not consider as priorities.