These public hearings follow the complaint fil by South Africa for “violation of the 1948 Unit Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide” on December 29, 2023.
In addition to accusing Israel of genocide, South Africa has also ask the International Court of Justice for “provisional measures.” These include the immiate suspension of Israel’s military operations in Gaza to protect the population, as well as measures to preserve evidence relat to the case.
For the Bondy blog, Ziad Maj, professor and director of the Middle Eastern studies program at the American University of Paris, looks back on this trial. Interview.
The adjective “historic” is often us
We are inde facing a historic event, for several reasons. First, it is rare for the International Court of Justice to be seiz of accusations of genocide.
The case present by South Africa is both strong, with information and a very substantial database regarding the crimes committ during this war. But it also presents documentation of the intentions of genocide, namely senegal phone number library the will to annihilate a group or part of a group by any means possible.
Bombing (killing over 20,000 civilians), forc displacement (of over 80% of the population), siege, denial of access to mical care. As well as affecting mental health and destroying or depriving everything that allows a life to thrive. Such as health infrastructure, ambulances, water, electricity, fuel, bakeries, schools, universities, etc.
So there is an extreme seriousness in relation
to the practices and crimes during this from existing websites to the description – traffic tip video 2 of 10 war, and South Africa is putting Israel in the dock for the first time.
Secondly, what is happening is historic because for the first afb directory time, at this high level, we have the development of a file that is legal, but which is also politically contextualiz. In other words, it evokes the occupation, colonization, apartheid, and which places everything in a historical continuity explaining how we got here.
This is a legal brief that explains how this war is the product of impunity and a total rejection of international law and UN resolutions. And as the lawyer Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh said in court, this war is also the product of complicity, or inaction, by a world that should be asham if it does not stop.